Is 3d in GameMaker really worth it?

3 Comments

  • Docopoper - 15 years ago

    I think it would be a shame if GM had no 3d - It allows people who are allready advanced in 2d to start a new chalange and create exeptional games. I actualy don't know any game development system that allows such advanced games in 3d - For egsample: 3D game maker (not game maker- another programme) is so overly restricted! Game maker in 3d is the perfect balance betweene C++ coding 3d and a user freindly IDE + 3d functions.

    I would like if mark would find out how to allow surfaces in 3d:
    as then people could add things like reflections,
    specular light reflections,
    gloss maps,
    bullet holes,
    3d destructibal terrains,
    the list goes on...

    Anyway - I voted Yes.

  • BattleRifle BR55 - 15 years ago

    If it wasn't for the 3D aspect, I wouldn't have even bothered with Game Maker. I think that for the simplicity of the program, 3D is an amazing addition, and I only hope that Mark eventually decides to further its purpose by adding new functions and such, or to at least optimize the speed of it.

  • slayer 64 - 15 years ago

    making 3d games in game maker is hard. but it's very rewarding. i can make a 3d game using a program that wasn't intended for it. other people give up on gm, but i become a better programmer because i have to create my own 3d collisions, movement, etc. that's why it's worth it.

Leave a Comment

0/4000 chars


Submit Comment